Aller au contenu principal

Mapping Test Cases to Requirements/User Stories

Overview​

Mapping test cases to requirements or user stories is the practice of ensuring that each specified system behavior or feature is verified by one or more test cases. This forms the foundation of requirement traceability, helping QA teams:

  • Validate that all requirements are tested
  • Identify gaps or redundant tests
  • Ensure changes in requirements are reflected in test cases
  • Facilitate audit and compliance tracking

Why It Matters​

  • Ensures test completeness

  • Aligns QA efforts with business needs

  • Helps manage regression risks when changes occur

  • Enables effective impact analysis

Key Concepts​

1. Requirements/User Stories​

These are functional or non-functional statements of what the system should do. In Agile, they are often written as:

"As a [user], I want to [do something], so that [value is achieved]."

Example:

As a customer, I want to reset my password via email, so I can regain access if I forget it.

2. Test Cases​

These are concrete steps to verify that the system behaves according to the requirement or user story.

Example test cases for the password reset story:

  • TC01: Verify reset link is sent to registered email
  • TC02: Verify link expires after X minutes
  • TC03: Verify password reset form accepts valid new passwords

Mapping Techniques​

1. Traceability Matrix​

The most common tool is the Requirement Traceability Matrix (RTM). It is a table that links each requirement to its associated test case(s).

Requirement/User Story IDRequirement DescriptionTest Case ID(s)
US-101Reset password via emailTC-01, TC-02, TC-03
US-102Login with social media accountTC-04, TC-05
NFR-01System must respond in <2 secTC-06

RTM is often maintained in tools like:

  • Jira (using plugins like Xray, Zephyr)
  • TestRail
  • qTest
  • Excel for small projects

2. One-to-Many and Many-to-One Mapping​

  • One requirement → Many test cases: Common when a feature has multiple validation paths (e.g., edge cases, negative testing)
  • Many requirements → One test case: Can occur if test logic overlaps, but should be used with caution

Best Practices​

  • Write clear, testable requirements and user stories
  • Ensure every requirement has at least one associated test case
  • Update mappings when:
    • Requirements change
    • Test cases are added/removed
  • Use tools that support bi-directional traceability
  • Include positive, negative, and edge case tests per requirement

Agile Considerations​

In Agile, mapping is more dynamic:

  • Link test cases directly to user stories in Jira
  • Use acceptance criteria from user stories to define test conditions
  • Review mapping during backlog grooming and sprint planning

Example:

User Story:

As a user, I want to sort products by price.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Sort ascending
  • Sort descending
  • Sort persists across pages

Mapped Test Cases:

  • TC10: Verify ascending sort
  • TC11: Verify descending sort
  • TC12: Verify sort state is retained on pagination

Benefits of Mapping​

BenefitDescription
TraceabilityUnderstand which tests validate which requirements
Impact AnalysisKnow which tests to update when a requirement changes
Gap DetectionSpot missing or unlinked requirements
Audit & ComplianceTrace coverage for regulated environments

Summary​

Mapping test cases to requirements or user stories ensures that testing is goal-driven, traceable, and complete. It forms the backbone of any structured QA effort—Agile or traditional.

“If you don’t trace your tests to requirements, you’re just testing for the sake of testing.”

Use a traceability matrix or integrated tooling to maintain and update this mapping as your project evolves.