Thursday, June 12, 2025, will be etched in the annals as a day when the internet revealed its flaws. A widespread outage affected a wide range of popular services and websites, revealing the intrinsic vulnerability of a digital ecosystem increasingly reliant on a limited number of hosting giants.
Remember Stack Overflow? For over a decade, it was the undisputed digital cathedral for developers, the first tab you opened when a coding problem stumped you. It was the collective brain of the programming world, a place where answers were forged through community wisdom and rigorous peer review.
The world of tech startups is often filled with grandiose promises, but sometimes, reality is far more down-to-earth, even shocking. The Builder AI case is a striking example. This "no-code" development startup, which had managed to raise hundreds of millions of dollars and attract the support of giants like Microsoft, recently made headlines for very bad reasons. The revelation? Its flagship platform, supposedly revolutionary and powered by an AI named Natasha, was in fact... manual work carried out by 700 human engineers based in India.
The C programming language. It's often hailed as the "mother of almost all modern languages," forming the bedrock of everything from operating systems and compilers to game engines and encryption tools. Its power and low-level control are unparalleled, making it indispensable for critical infrastructure. Yet, this very power comes with a demanding responsibility: manual memory management.
In the world of software development, Git is ubiquitous. It's the default tool for millions of developers and projects, almost a given, "as common as water," as our source's author points out. It's perceived as the only viable solution for managing code. So imagine the surprise of discovering that Facebook (now Meta), one of the world's largest tech companies, does not use Git as its primary version control system for its immense monorepos.